🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the baseball championship did not occur during the nail-biting final game on Saturday, when her squad executed one death-defying comeback act after another and then winning in overtime against the Toronto Blue Jays.

It happened in the previous game, when two supporting players, Kike Hernández and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a thrilling, decisive sequence that at the same time upended numerous harmful stereotypes touted about Hispanic people in recent decades.

The play in itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from left field to catch a ball he initially misjudged in the bright lights, then threw it to second base to record another, decisive out. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball moments before a opposing player collided with him, sending him to the ground.

This wasn't just a great sporting achievement, possibly the decisive turn in momentum in the Dodgers' favor after appearing for much of the games like the weaker side. To her, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a much-required morale boost for the community and for Los Angeles after months of enforcement actions, troops monitoring the streets, and a constant drumbeat of negativity from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy presented this counter-narrative," said Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, exhibiting a different kind of confidence. They're energetic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"It was such a contrast with what we see on the news – raids, Latinos thrown to the ground and chased down. It is so simple to be demoralized right now."

Not that it's exactly simple to be a Dodgers fan these days – for her or for the many of other Latinos who attend regularly to matches and fill up as many as half of the venue's fifty thousand spots per game.

The Mixed Relationship with the Team

When aggressive immigration raids started in Los Angeles in early June, and military troops were deployed into the city to respond to ensuing demonstrations, two of the local soccer clubs promptly released messages of solidarity with immigrant families – while the Dodgers.

Management has said the Dodgers prefer to steer clear of politics – a stance colored, perhaps, by the reality that a sizable portion of the supporters, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain leaders. After considerable public pressure, the organization subsequently pledged $1m in support for families directly impacted by the raids but made no official condemnation of the administration.

Official Visit and Historical Legacy

Three months earlier, the organization did not delay in agreeing to an invitation to mark their previous World Series win at the White House – a decision that local writers labeled as "disappointing … spineless … and hypocritical", given the Dodgers' boast in having been the pioneering major league team to end the racial segregation in the 1940s and the frequent references of that legacy and the principles it embodies by executives and present and former athletes. A number of team members such as the manager had expressed unwillingness to go to the event during the first term but either reconsidered or gave in to demands from the organization.

Corporate Control and Supporter Conflicts

A further complication for fans is that the Dodgers are controlled by a large investment group, Guggenheim Partners, whose equity holdings, as per media reports and its own released financial documents, involve a stake in a detention company that runs detention centers. Guggenheim's leadership has stated repeatedly that it aims to stay out of politics, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own form of compliance to current agendas.

These factors contribute to considerable mixed feelings among Latino fans in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this year's hard-fought championship victory and the following explosion of team support across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to support the Dodgers?" area columnist one observer reflected at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant article ruminating on "Dodger blue in our blood, but doubt in our minds". He couldn't finally bring himself to watch the World Series, but he still felt strongly, to the extent that he decided his personal protest must have brought the squad the fortune it needed to win.

Separating the Players from the Owners

Many fans who share Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can continue to support the team and its roster of global players, including the Asian megastar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's business leadership. Nowhere was this more evident than at the victory celebration at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in support of the manager and his athletes but booed the executive and the top official of the ownership group.

"The executives in formal attire do not get to take our players from us," the fan said. "We've been with the team longer than they have."

Historical Context and Community Impact

The issue, though, runs deeper than only the organization's present proprietors. The agreement that brought the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the late 1950s required the municipality demolishing three low-income Latino neighborhoods on a hill overlooking downtown and then selling the land to the organization for a fraction of its actual worth. A song on a mid-2000s album that documents the events has an impoverished worker at the venue revealing that the home he lost to eviction is now a part of the field.

Gustavo Arellano, perhaps the region's most widely followed Latino columnist and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, problematic relationship between the franchise and its fanbase. He describes the team the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an undue, even harmful following by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its supporters for years.

"They have acted around Latino fans while profiting from them with the other for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano wrote over the summer, when calls to avoid the organization over its lack of response to the enforcement actions were contradicted by the uncomfortable fact that attendance at home games remained steady, even at the peak of the demonstrations when the city center was subject to a evening curfew.

Global Players and Fan Connections

Distinguishing the team from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {